#BO$$

Saturday, September 24, 2016

The Best/Worst of the Week in Patriots - 9/24

patspropaganda:

The Best/Worst of the Week in #Patriots 9/24 from @nikod_bbs

JJ, your check bounced. Your landlord will be knocking first thing tomorrow. Don’t make him do it again. What a game. What a night. What a week. It was truly a roller coaster, for Patriots fans and haters alike. I swear we heard it all this week: from the desperate, to the antagonistic, to the flat out shameful. I’ll try to keep it as chronological as possible, but bear with me. (more…)

View On WordPress


Full article from NFL Offseason via http://ift.tt/2dex3QU

Monday, June 13, 2016

PatsPropaganda 2016 Patriots Season Preview Book

patspropaganda:

Here it is!!!! PatsPropaganda 2016 Patriots Season Preview Book

Here it is, my second season of putting out a full Patriots season preview book! It’s 40 pages of all Patriots (10 more pages than last year’s!) covering anything you could ever possibly want or need to know to prepare for the start of the 2016 season. Why buy one of those national preview magazines with just a few measly pages dedicated to the Pats in a cursory overview that’s already out of…

View On WordPress

If you’re a Pats fan, PatsPropaganda should be among your must reads.


Full article from NFL Offseason via http://ift.tt/1tmw7wu

Friday, June 10, 2016

Our Latest Show: June 11-12

Is it time to ban football from public high schools? That and more on this week's episode of Only A Game.
Full article from Only a Game via http://ift.tt/25PDjmy

Saturday, June 04, 2016

Charlie Pierce: The Week In Sports

For the first time in the history of the event, Copa America will be hosted by the U.S. (Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images)

Besides two consecutive trips to the NBA Finals, what else do Stephen Curry and LeBron James have in common? Only A Game analyst Charlie Pierce tells Bill Littlefield about a bond that goes back to Day 1. Also, American tennis player Shelby Rogers, ranked just 108th heading into the French Open, defied the odds and advanced all the way to the quarterfinals. Is her performance in Paris an outlier? Or is she the real deal? And, Copa America is being hosted by the United States for the first time ever. Bill and Charlie discuss the upcoming tournament for regional soccer supremacy.

More of Charlie Pierce:


Full article from Only a Game via http://ift.tt/25FFmcE

Saturday, May 28, 2016

Mike Pesca: America’s Obsession With Deflategate

FOXBORO, MA - MAY 24: Paul Goodrow of Watertown, Massachusetts holds a sign in support of New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady at the "Free Tom Brady" rally at Gillette Stadium on May 24, 2015 in Foxboro, Massachusetts. The rally was held in protest of Brady's four game suspension for his role in the "deflategate" scandal. (Photo by Maddie Meyer/Getty Images)

The Deflategate scandal and Tom Brady remain at the forefront of the news cycle after yet another appeal against the quarterback’s suspension. (Maddie Meyer/Getty Images)

It seems as though Deflategate will never be put to rest. After a suspension, an appeal, another suspension and yet another appeal, the controversy shows no signs of ever ending. But maybe that’s not what is most concerning about the ways in which deflated footballs, PSI levels and the Patriots quarterback have become a part of Americans’ collective consciousness.

Mike Pesca points out that the real concern might lie in what Americans don’t know about or aren’t aware of, as they continue to follow Deflategate so closely.

“And what’s so fascinating is that sports media just has to say anything about Deflategate, and millions and millions of people will know exactly where we are in the story, what the stakes are, and, if they’re fair-minded folk (i.e. if they agree with me), they will have strong opinions about inflation gauges, Goodell’s overstepping his authority and maybe they can cite a clause or two of the ideal gas law.

“I think more people know about Deflategate than know about the basics of American life.”

Mike Pesca hosts the daily podcast, The Gist, from Slate and is a panelist on the sports podcast HANG UP AND LISTEN; which posts every Monday. Listen to Pesca’s complete thoughts by clicking the play button below the headline at the top of the page.

Related:


Full article from Only a Game via http://ift.tt/1sDsh1I

3 Stories: NFL CTE Funding, Matt Harvey, Draymond Green’s Low Blow

Should Draymond Green have been suspended for kicking OKC's Steven Adams in the You-Know-Where? (J Pat Carter/Getty Images)

Should Draymond Green have been suspended for kicking OKC’s Steven Adams in the You-Know-Where? (J Pat Carter/Getty Images)

The NFL players’ union characterized the NFL as “bullies” after a congressional report found that they had been trying to interfere with the NIH’s concussion research. Is there anything the league won’t do to protect its image? Also, Matt Harvey hasn’t really shown up on the pitcher’s mound this season. Should he still be required to show up for interviews? And Draymond Green (mostly) got away with a certain cringe-worthy “flail” against OKC. Should the man and the moment have factored into the NBA’s ruling?

Craig Calcaterra of NBCSports.com and David Steele of Sporting News joined Bill Littlefield for this week’s edition of “3 Stories You Should Know.”

1. NFL’s Meddling

Roger Goodell and the NFL are (again) in the headlines for the wrong reasons. This time, the league apparently reneged on its promise to fund a concussion study because the doctors in charge have been critical of the league. A congressional report released this week detailed the league’s actions, and members of the Players’ Union say the league can’t be trusted. David Steele chimes in on the NFL’s most recently revealed wrongdoing.    

“The league is doing an absolutely reprehensible job of taking responsibility and being fully accountable for the part they play in all this. And if it doesn’t get better, then something a lot worse than a congressional committee is going to be holding their feet to the fire from now on.”

2. Matt Harvey Avoids the Press 

The Mets’ ace, or former ace, has not gotten off to a good start this season, to say the least. Harvey was heavily criticized for not talking to the media after his latest poor performance. The press played up his lack of “accountability.” Craig Calcaterra says the scandal has been overblown.

“It used to be a situation where the press would say, ‘How dare he not answer to us?’ They realized that’s not a very good look. So now it’s, ‘How dare he not be accountable to his fellow teammates who now have to answer questions about him when he should be answering them?’ Never mind that they’re still going to ask those questions of his teammates anyway. It’s kind of ridiculous.”

3. Draymond’s Special Treatment

If you haven’t seen the footage from Game 3, here it is. Green was fined, but not suspended, by the NBA. Some say the punishment was fair, given the incident’s heightened stakes. Bill Littlefield questions whether the league’s decision was unduly influenced by circumstance.   

“Lots of writers have congratulated the NBA for its levelheadedness. He’s an important player, and the argument was that it was an important game. And that sort of importance shouldn’t be the point. You cannot kick your opponent in the groin, or the head, or the stomach, or anywhere else for that matter, and stay on the floor.”

More Stories You Should Know:


Full article from Only a Game via http://ift.tt/1sDsBNT

Wednesday, May 25, 2016

Mickelson News: A Reminder That ‘It's Great To Be In Sports’

“It’s great to be an athlete. It’s great to be in sports./You do a lot of stuff that might land other folks in courts,” Bill Littlefield writes. (Harry How/Getty Images)

Bill Littlefield has noticed lately that some people who make their living from games are playing out of bounds. Golfer Phil Mickelson’s shady handicapping of the stock market comes to mind, as does this week’s revelation that Roger Goodell et al. changed their minds about funding an NIH study of brain damage among former football players.

It’s great to be an athlete. It’s great to be in sports.
You do a lot of stuff that might land other folks in courts.
And I don’t mean the courts for playing basketball, my friend.
I mean the courts where pain feels like it might not ever end.

Consider, for example, a rich golfer gaining more
By means of information that he didn’t have before
He got it from insiders who knew where the money’d go
Before the general public knew, for we are often slow.

The golfer is Phil Mickelson, and he had friends with friends
Who had connections with some folks whose means as well as ends
Are frowned upon by those we charge with making up the rules
Designed to help ensure that all the unconnected fools
Won’t lose their shirts to wise guys, sharpies, aka the pros,
Who trade on others’ ignorance. And where the money goes
Is anybody’s guess until they seek it far offshore,
Where it can grow in secrecy and soon be joined by more.

Phil Mickelson got caught, I guess, that happens, as it seems,
The consequence can be described as what another dreams
Of if he’s broken laws, and though it might seem almost funny,
Phil Mickelson was simply asked to please give back the money.

It’s good to be Phil Mickelson. There is no doubt of that.
And good, as well, to be Roger Goodell, whose bank account is fat.
The league atop which he now sits had said they’d fund a study…
Until it seemed what was discovered just might further muddy
The NFL’s contention, which has never really changed,
That all the former players who are currently deranged
Mean nothing much compared to the imperative to sell
Pro football to the public… and the sale is going well.
The League, the shield of which Goodell has worshiped, has said “No!”
“We do not like the doctors, so our money will not go
To helping them help players who have made our lives quite grand,”
‘Where are your principles?’ you say. “Ah, well, that’s where we stand.”
Are fans OK with how that sounds? Who knows and who can tell?
Perhaps one day the ax will fall upon the NFL.
There may be yet more damning tapes and transcripts and reports
But as of here and as of now, it’s great to be in sports.

Related:


Full article from Only a Game via http://ift.tt/1Z0O4eq

Saturday, May 21, 2016

High-Interest Loans Tempt Families Waiting For NFL Settlement Checks

(Courtesy)

Gerry Sullivan (51) playing football the way he was taught to play — by tackling head first. (Courtesy of Liz Nicholson)

If you Google the words, “concussion” “settlement” and “loan,” you’ll find ads. Lots of them. And they’re all variations on a theme: The NFL has agreed to pay former players up to $1 billion. No one knows when the payments will begin. And former players are struggling, sick, bankrupt. They need money. Now.

Then comes the hook. Or rather, the promise: “We can solve this problem for you,” the ads promise former players. “It’s not a loan. It’s an advance on the money you’re due. And if the settlement doesn’t go through or if your claim is denied, you don’t have to pay back that advance.” The small print may mention that if you get the money, you’ll repay that alleged non-loan and interest of 40 percent…or more.

The former NFL players being offered these deals are especially vulnerable to the pitch-man’s lure. We first read about the issue in The New York Times. Liz Nicholson saw that article, too. It was all over her Facebook and social media feeds. But she says the news wasn’t exactly new.

“All of the people in the NFL were very aware of what’s going on,” Nicholson says. “In fact, there had been a letter that I think was sent out, I wanna say, a couple years ago, warning families about this very thing.”

Liz Nicholson and her friends can’t remember who sent the letter. It might have been from the Players’ Association. Liz received the warning because she’s the wife of Gerry Sullivan, who was a lineman for the Cleveland Browns from 1974 to 1981. She’s also the Finance Director for the Senate Democrats in Illinois. She knows her way around a financial spreadsheet, and she would likely never recommend that someone take on a loan from an unregulated lender who charges upwards of 40 percent interest. But these loans aren’t being offered to just anyone. They’re being offered to former players who are showing signs of brain damage.

“So risky, so bad,” Nicholson says. “I have a lot of love for my husband and his brethren in the NFL. I’m not saying anything disparaging against them. It’s just that so many of them are suffering and one of the biggest things, Karen, is that they lack impulse control. They’re not in the right frame of mind to be agreeing to these loans, and I know that from experience from my husband, Gerry.”

both

Liz Nicholson and her husband Gerry Sullivan. (Courtesy Liz Nicholson)

Liz and Gerry met long after his football career was over. He was divorced, with three daughters.

“When I first met Gerry back in 1997, he was $70,000 in debt to the IRS,” Nicholson says. “He had so many issues going on. He could not manage his money.

“So we’ve been together a long time and been through a lot, a lot together. We had two years where I left him, due to his illness from football. I like to call it the football disease, because obviously you can’t diagnose CTE until postmortem.”

For now, Gerry Sullivan’s official diagnosis is early onset dementia. He was given that label when he was only 52 years old. Before that, doctors thought he was bipolar, because he had such dramatic mood swings and a difficult time controlling his rage.

“As a joke, people used to call Gerry — Gerry with a G — Scary Gerry. Now that I think back on it, it hurts my heart, because I know that Gerry was ill from football,” Nicholson says. “It wasn’t that he was just this maniacal, violent human being. He was brain-damaged, and that’s why he acted out like he did.”

These days, doctors recognize mood swings and rage as possible signs of chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE, a degenerative disorder caused by multiple concussions and sub-concussive hits. But back when Liz and Gerry started dating, CTE hadn’t yet been identified.

“So was Gerry already showing signs when you started dating? Like was this already happening?” I ask.

“I would say that yes, he was,” Nicholson says. “He was showing signs, and I saw the signs and I chose to ignore them, you know, because I loved him, and I was literally so embarrassed by some of his behavior that I didn’t tell anyone about it for fear of people telling me to leave him. And I knew that, as an educated woman, I thought, ‘My God, am I like one of these women that’s gonna stay with a guy who has the capacity to be violent and scary?’”

Gerry Sullivan hadn’t always been violent and scary. After he retired from football, he got a job — as most of the players from his era did. Sullivan never made more than about $90,000 a year playing football.

“He had a lot of good years. He’s a very, very bright, wonderful human being. Unfortunately there’s some — he thinks it’s embarrassing, but to me I tell him not to be embarrassed by this — there’s a lot of stuff on the internet that you can find due to our disability application process. As you could read, his rage and depression and lack of impulse control really fouled him up, and he was terminated because of his behavioral problems.”

So here’s what Liz can’t bring herself to say — the thing you can read about on the internet. Gerry was the Chief Operating Officer of a company that leased automatic ice machines. He was well liked. He did a good job. Until the disease took over, and he was fired for threatening other employees and punching holes in walls and ice machines.

“It’s painful to talk about. And it still is painful to talk about for a lot of women married to these fellas, because we love them, and we take care of them. But they are — they have serious problems, and it doesn’t help that they are larger-than-life characters in physicality and stature,” Nicholson says.

It was about a decade ago that Liz left Gerry. She doesn’t want to get into the details, but she says things were bad. Really bad. Divorce is common among those suffering from CTE.

But here’s where Liz and Gerry’s story is different from those of all but a handful of former NFL players and their families. Gerry applied for total and permanent disability from the NFL. He cited severe orthopedic injury and cognitive impairment as a result of his eight-year NFL career. The process took years. But on Jan. 1, 2005, the NFL approved Gerry’s claim.

“Of course as the NFL continued to deny that there was a link between football and head injury they were paying us for that very thing,” Nicholson says.

Liz has never figured out why the NFL granted her husband’s claim while denying so many others. Gerry went from having no money and no health insurance to receiving a modest pension and qualifying for Social Security and Medicaid.

“Had he not received that, I don’t know if I would’ve come back to our home that we shared together because things were going really, really bad,” Nicholson says. “And I’m not saying I returned to him because he got the disability awarded. I returned to him because his spirits went up and he started getting medically treated. Because he needed to be treated he needed to go begin the ungodly road of treating early dementia and depression and rage.”

Today, Liz says Gerry’s violent episodes have softened a bit, as the dementia has started to take over. Still, she loves him.

(Courtesy)

Gerry Sullivan in 1980. (Courtesy of Liz Nicholson)

“My husband is very bright, and he’s one of the funniest guys you’ll ever meet. He’s very self-deprecating, he’s very witty. And even with all of the brain damage, Gerry’s strong enough where you can still see the shining light of his humor. And I think that’s something to be commended because a lot of people would have given up by now for the things that he’s gone through in his brain. The things that go on in his head, I can only imagine.”

Gerry is eligible for an award from the concussion lawsuit. All players who retired before 2014 are in, unless they opted out of the settlement. Some former players are still trying to block the deal in court in the hopes that they can negotiate a better one. But Liz says she’s not in that camp.

“The whole thing about a class-action settlement, nothing’s ever going to be perfect. You settle. That’s the term. There are people in dire need right now. And it needs to be settled, and the football players and the brothers of Gerry’s who need that money need to get that money.”

It wasn’t until two years ago that Liz started talking with the wives of other players. Before that, she says, she was too embarrassed. But now the women swap stories through a private Facebook group. They no longer need to feel alone and isolated. The group has more than 2000 members.

Liz knows some families are desperate for the settlement. She understands why they’re considering the high-interest loans. If the league hadn’t granted his disability claim, Liz says that she and Gerry might be that desperate.

“I don’t know if he’d be alive today,” she says. “I don’t mean to say it like that, but it saved Gerry in a way.

“But had he not gotten that, like all these other players didn’t get, of course an award like this might seem very promising, you know, because he’d have no money.”

It could take years before the settlement starts paying out, and it could take even longer before a player’s claim is approved. All the while, interest will be piling up at the rate of 40 percent or more.

And at the same time, the amount of money that player will receive from the settlement pool will be getting smaller. Much smaller. It’s a sliding scale. The older you are, the less you get paid. So, by the time the NFL pays up and then the lawyers take their share and the lenders take their share, there might be nothing left. Liz is worried that some players won’t even bother to pursue their claim — or seek treatment — because of the amount of money they would owe.

Liz Nicholson has considered all the ways in which these loans could go wrong for men who are suffering from the same condition as her husband. But she’s spent less time considering what she would say if one of her new friends asked for advice on whether to take one.

“You know what? I would never judge anybody else in this world of the football disease, as I call it,” Nicholson says. “I would never judge them. But what I would tell these women is, hold off. As much as you can.”

Related:


Full article from Only a Game via http://ift.tt/1U53E7h

Sunday, May 15, 2016

These guys!



These guys!


Full article from NFL Offseason via http://ift.tt/1Ot93Wt

Saturday, May 14, 2016

The $19 Million Quarterback And The $7,000 Ford Bronco

Why is former Packers quarterback Matt Flynn excited? He just sold his car for $7,000. (Ronald Martinez/Getty Images)

Why is former Packers QB Matt Flynn excited? He just sold his car on Twitter. (Ronald Martinez/Getty Images)

It was 2013, and this pro quarterback bought a car, which wouldn’t be much of a story, except he was making NFL money when he bought it, and the car was 17 years old.

“It’s my baby,” quarterback Matt Flynn says. “1996 green Ford Bronco.”

It would be no exaggeration to say that you’d not seen nothing like the Mighty Flynn, as long as you were referring only to the game in 2012 in which the Green Bay Packers beat the Detroit Lions, 45-41. Flynn, starting for the Packers, threw for 480 yards and six touchdowns that day. Bart Starr never did that. Neither did Brett Favre or Aaron Rodgers.

Flynn has started a total of six other games in a career that has included employment — sometimes very brief employment — by seven NFL teams.

“I’m trying to hit all 32 teams before I call it quits,” Flynn says.

A worthy goal, as long as he continues to remain on the bench, where injuries are minimal.

Anyway, Matt Flynn bought the Bronco from his brother-in-law.

“It was a hell of a ride,” Flynn says.

I’m sure it was.

“It was kind of my take-the-top-off, or take-the-back-off, and ride around in the country with the wind in my hair,” Flynn says. “That was a go-to car when we needed to give the dogs a lift. It’s one of those cars that added a little bit more character when it had some slobber stains. Some dog hair in it.”

He was going to soup up the Bronco, but travel from the bench in Oakland to the bench in New Orleans and so on got in the way. So eventually, Matt decided to sell the car. Which is not to say he needed the money. Matt Flynn has been paid about $19 million to play quarterback over the past eight years. That works out to about $2,700,000 per start, which puts his per game rate way ahead of Ben Roethlisberger, Russell Wilson and everybody else as well. Still, when Matt’s parents saw the Bronco listed on Twitter, they didn’t know what to think.

“They just asked me,” Flynn recalls, “if it was gas money that I needed, and they could help me out with it — then laughed and said, ‘It’s about time you got rid of that car.'”

A buyer willing to consider Matt’s asking price, $7,000, surfaced in Houston, and the deal was done, though not without some regret.

“There’s a decent amount of seller’s remorse going on,” Flynn says. “I look at the parking spot it was parked in in front of my house. It’s just empty now.”

Sounds like a country music song, doesn’t it?

“I look out of my door each day, and it just seems to me, / There’s nothin’ there but empty where my Bronco used to be.”

Anyway, Matt’s not wasting time lamenting the Bronco’s departure. Though he’s no longer under contract to the Packers, the Saints, the Raiders or any of his other former employers in the NFL, it’s OK with him if the phone rings. Maybe he’ll even be home.

“I’m not retired,” Flynn says. “I consider myself a self-employed NFL quarterback. I’m just here, here in Louisiana, staying in shape and just living life.”

“I would think,” I say, “it would be great to be a self-employed quarterback as long as you live near some self-employed NFL ends and perhaps a couple of self-employed offensive linemen.”

“That’s exactly right,” Flynn says. “The salary cap’s not as strict here.”

And should self-employment as a quarterback not work out, Matt Flynn, having sold his Bronco on Twitter, has another option, he thinks.

“I have friends now that are calling me, because they have an old refrigerator they want me to sell on Twitter for them, or something,” he says. “I might just start a Twitter store and just take commission.”

And so concludes the story of the quarterback who bought a car, because he sold it, so that’s that, except that he also beat the system by making $19 million for starting seven games. And he fell into another career altogether, or at least thought about it on a day when he told me it was 90 degrees on the porch down in Louisiana, thought about it, since, it being May, there’s no reason for even a self-employed quarterback to be thinking about football.

Related:


Full article from Only a Game via http://ift.tt/1s9jm7V

Saturday, May 07, 2016

3 Stories You Should Know: A&M Rant, NFL PR, Athlete Endorsements

The Twitterverse didn't appreciate a series of tweets from Texas A&M's wide receivers coach. (Scott Halleran/Getty Images)

A series of tweets from Texas A&M’s wide receivers coach was not well-received. (Scott Halleran/Getty Images)

After learning that quarterback recruit Tate Martell had decommitted, Texas A&M wide receivers coach Aaron Moorehead took to Twitter to express his not-so-subtle feelings. Moorehead’s comments led a second A&M recruit to decommit and a third potential recruit to stop considering the school. This social media dust-up is the first of this week’s “3 Stories You Should Know.”

Nancy Armour of USA Today and Patrick Hruby of Vice Sports joined Bill Littlefield.

1. Texas A&M’s Twitter Blunder

While Texas A&M wide receivers coach Aaron Moorehead contemplates the power and consequences of 140-character messages, it’s clear his tweets left a mark on potential Aggie recruits. Nancy Armour weighs in.

NA: He apologized yesterday, saying this was just because of his passion for Texas A&M and he wanted to defend Texas A&M. But it kind of shows that kids are not the only people who need a lesson in social media etiquette and a what you say out in public stays out in public. And it reflects not only on you but the people you represent.

2. NFL Strengthens Washington Defense 

As more fans worry about the long-term health risks of football, the NFL is trying to combat the so-called “War on Football.” On Thursday, Politico reported that the NFL hired Natalie Ravitz as it’s senior vice president of communications. Ravitz served as the chief of staff to media mogul Rupert Murdoch. Her hiring comes after the NFL picked up President Bill Clinton’s press secretary Joe Lockhart. Patrick Hruby thinks hiring these PR execs shows the NFL is serious about its standing in Washington. 

PH:. The NFL is like any other big industry. It wants to protect its interests. And one of the biggest threats to that is federal interference. It just wants to be left to its own devices. How do you do that? Well, here in Washington we know: the way you do that is through relationships. And the best way to establish relationships is to buy them.

3. Should Athletes Endorse Presidential Candidates? 

Apparent GOP nominee Donald Trump has received endorsements from former Indiana University basketball coach Bob Knight, former Notre Dame football coach Lou Holtz and many other sports figures. On the other side of the aisle, Abby Wambach has endorsed Hillary Clinton. Bill Littlefield has nothing against athletes or coaches who take a stand on political issues, but he wonders why we should care when they endorse a specific candidate.

BL: If a former athlete has become a thoughtful writer, a social critic — say, for example, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar — then, sure. But a cranky old coach or an athlete who sounds as if he’s never read a newspaper, let alone a book? I don’t care who they support!

More Stories You Should Know:


Full article from Only a Game via http://ift.tt/1SVx05x

Tuesday, May 03, 2016

First in our new series, “Rookies We Lurve…And once you...

Saturday, April 30, 2016

The Takeaway From Laremy Tunsil’s NFL Draft Night

Some scouts pegged former Ole Miss linebacker as the No. 1 prospect in this year's NFL Draft. But, thanks to a social media hacker, Tunsil fell to No. 13 (Joe Robbins/Getty Images)

Some scouts pegged former Ole Miss lineman as the No. 1 prospect in this year’s NFL Draft. But, thanks in part to a social media hacker, Tunsil fell to No. 13 (Joe Robbins/Getty Images)

Laremy Tunsil, a lineman late of Ole Miss, was the 13th pick in NFL Draft.

He’s very good at playing football, and he probably would have gone higher in the draft, but for the efforts of a mischievous hacker who placed images on his Twitter and Instagram accounts.

On the Twitter account, just before the draft, there appeared a two-year-old video of Tunsil inhaling marijuana through a gas mask attached to a bong. On the Instagram account, there appeared a text message in which Tunsil had asked one of his coaches to help him out with the rent and his mother’s electric bill.

To his credit, Tunsil acknowledged the veracity of both posts.

The Miami Dolphins either didn’t care about that stuff or they determined that nobody who hadn’t smoked dope and broken some of the NCAA’s rules could help the team as much as Tunsil could.

Last year’s No. 1 pick was quarterback Jameis Winston. He’d been accused of rape. He shouted profanities in public, and he was caught shoplifting. He signed a contract worth more than $25 million over four years. So his alleged high crimes and established misdemeanors cost him nothing.

Laremy Tunsil’s use of marijuana and request for some rent and electric bill money is estimated to have cost him $5 million to $8 million, based on the assumption that he’d have been drafted earlier if the embarrassing material hadn’t appeared when it did.

This is a story to which all sorts of different morals might be attached.

One of them is that it’s good to be the quarterback.

Related:


Full article from Only a Game via http://ift.tt/1roPww8

Deflategate To The Supreme Court? Nina Totenberg Weighs In

<> at Gillette Stadium on May 24, 2015 in Foxboro, Massachusetts.

Will the Supreme Court of the United States “free” Tom Brady? NPR’s Nina Totenberg thinks Patriots fans shouldn’t get their hopes up. (Maddie Meyer/Getty Images)

“I’m going to tell you a dirty little secret,” says Nina Totenberg, who’s been covering the Supreme Court for NPR since the ’70s. “As far as I know, there is only one really avid football fan on the United States Supreme Court.”

I’ll tell you who that is, by and by, but consider that if Totenberg is right, the other seven justices aren’t real Americans! Let’s see their birth certificates! Nah, I’ll leave that scoop to somebody who needs a bump in his run for high office.

Anyway, Totenberg is talking about football partly because I asked her to, but also because on Monday, a federal appeals court affirmed NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell’s suspension of New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady.

As of now, it looks as if Brady will miss the first four games of next season.

But…Monday’s decision could be appealed to the Supreme Court.

Imagine: SCOTUS On Deflategate

“The truth is the Republic won’t rise and fall on it,” Totenberg says. “But I think this is a question of contract law vs. individual rights.”

See, Totenberg is taking this seriously, and so, perhaps, should you, even though Deflategate probably won’t get that far. The court only hears about 1 percent of petitions.

But what if Brady v. Goodell did make the cut?

The legal issue would have to do with the commissioner’s authority. Let’s turn it over to the expert:

“There are some justices who basically say the letter of the law is the letter of the law,” Totenberg says. “You agreed to the contract. Goodell was within his rights. And you have no rights under this contractual provision. Then there’s another way to look at it. People who are strongly in favor of individual rights might say you do have certain rights to your reputation and the way you make your living, and they can’t be ceded. Liberals and conservatives might be on either side.”

The Court’s No. 1 Fan

So: rights that must be retained vs. those that can be surrendered. Sounds pretty important, right? And the case might have some other significant implications as well. Remember that dirty little secret to which Ms. Totenberg alluded? The only football fan on the court is in fact Justice Clarence Thomas, judicial man of mystery. He went a decade without asking a single question in court. But if the subject had to do — even remotely — with football…would he…?

“Yeah, he might,” Totenberg says. “Because he knows a lot more about it than the other folks.”

“Then this would be significant for that reason alone,” I say.

“Yes,” Totenberg says. “It would be very significant.”

OK, but now for the critical question: how would the country’s highest court come down on the most over-inflated dispute ever to embarrass the National Football League, if the league were in fact capable of embarrassment?

“I don’t know,” Totenberg says. “I don’t know how it would turn out. It would be fun. It would certainly spice up the term, because these folks on the Supreme Court who are often divided 4-4 at the moment, they’re not taking any cases of any consequence because they’re afraid they might disagree on it and just be able to reach no conclusion. So this might be a good time to bring that case.”

Absolutely. Picture it: Clarence Thomas sits up straight, clears his throat, and what fun he might have explaining safeties and touchbacks to Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Anthony Kennedy.

Related:


Full article from Only a Game via http://ift.tt/1roPuo9

3 Stories You Should Know: NFL Draft Silliness, Painkillers, #MoreThanMean

Do former Ohio State cornerback Eli Apple's (allegedly) questionable skills in the kitchen impact his ability to cook wide receivers on the field? The Giants didn't seem to think so. (Charles Rex Arbogast/AP)

Do former Ohio State cornerback Eli Apple’s (allegedly) questionable skills in the kitchen impact his ability to cook wide receivers on the field? The Giants didn’t seem to think so. (Charles Rex Arbogast/AP)

Ahead of Thursday’s NFL Draft, one anonymous scout warned against former Ohio State cornerback Eli Apple because, as the scout said, the young man “had no life skills. Can’t cook.” Apple says he was shocked to learn of that evaluation. He says he’s a pretty fair cook. His specialties include waffles, burgers, and hash brown potatoes. Should an NFL prospect’s cooking skills factor into their draft stock? That’s first up on this week’s “3 Stories You Should Know.”

The Boston Globe’s Shira Springer and David Steele of Sporting News join Bill Littlefield.

1. NFL Draft Silliness 

Ultimately, Apple’s cooking skills — or lack thereof — didn’t deter the New York Giants, who selected him with the 10th overall pick. But it’s incidents like these that make Bill Littlefield decry the spectacle that the NFL Draft has become.

BL: Nobody knows which of these players will actually help an NFL team or when that might happen. Though, Eli Apple does know that, whether or not he has a football career, he still can cook a little bit. Wouldn’t it be better for everybody if the NFL and the people who talk and write about it just let the players try to play their way onto teams and see whether they were going to have careers or not?

2. Prince And Painkillers

Legendary musician Prince passed away just over a week ago at the age of 57. In the days after Prince’s death, there has been speculation that prescription painkillers may have been involved. The news caught the attention of at least one active NFL player. Baltimore’s Eugene Monroe says he is concerned because has taken opioids numerous times to get back on the field. 

Like Monroe, David Steele hopes that Prince’s death will cause the NFL to take another look at its drug policy.

DS: The fact that Prince is now in the news because of this, Eugene Monroe and a lot of NFL players are thinking, “Maybe this will open a lot of people’s eyes to the dangers of these things and what we’re asked to do.” And I think he’s right and I hope it wakes everybody else up as well.

3. #MoreThanMean

[Watch on YouTube]

This week, Just Not Sports produced a video highlighting the type of online harassment women in sports face daily. In it, journalists Sarah Spain and Julie DiCaro sit while men read actual, vitriolic tweets that DiCario and Spain have received. The video has been viewed almost 3 million times. Shira Springer wonders what it will take to change this culture of hate — or if it is just entrenched in sports.

SS: There’s no debate that this type of harassment is beyond, beyond atrocious. But, speaking from personal experience, it’s nothing new. Julie and Sarah brought attention to the issue, but I wonder what, if anything, can be done about it and I think that’s where the conversation needs to go — to Twitter, or leagues, or teams, or athletes step up and say something. Will that help? Or is sexism so entrenched in some corners of the sports world that it’s impossible to route out?

More Stories You Should Know:


Full article from Only a Game via http://ift.tt/1SE6Dku

Saturday, April 23, 2016

How The $1B Concussion Settlement Fails Former Players

13 Sep 1992: Defensive lineman Fred Smerlas of the New England Patriots (left) works against the Los Angeles Rams during a game at Anaheim Stadium in Anaheim, California. The Rams won the game, 14-0. Mandatory Credit: Ken Levine /Allsport

Former Pro Bowler Fred Smerlas says he suffered countless concussions during his NFL career. But under the terms of the concussion settlement approved Monday, Smerlas is unlikely to get relief. (Ken Levine /Allsport)

Sportswriter Patrick Hruby recently got a phone call from a guy he didn’t know.

“This gentleman is in his 30s,” Hruby recalls. “And he sounded pretty suicidal.”

The guy had played in the NFL. He knew Hruby had been writing about former players suffering from the effects of hits to the head. He needed somebody to talk to.

“He hears his young kids cry and he wants to throw them to the ground,” Hruby says. “His marriage has gone bad. He told me, ‘I’m a college-educated man, Patrick, and I cannot read a one-page letter anymore. I cannot make the paragraphs and the words make sense.'”

That former player, whose name Hruby didn’t want to reveal, doesn’t have Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, or ALS. If he did, he’d be entitled to compensation according to the settlement between the NFL and the former players who sued the league four years ago. That settlement was upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals on Monday. If it turns out that the player has chronic traumatic encephalopathy, which can’t be determined until after he’s dead, his family will be compensated. They will also get some help if dementia renders the player helpless and incompetent.

But right now, he’s out of luck.

That’s not how the thousands of former players who sued the NFL in 2012 thought it would work out.

‘Frustration’ And ‘Betrayal’

“Basically, we thought if we’ve had any type of concussion, that we would be able to get some type of settlement from that,” says Dennis DeVaughn, who played for the Philadelphia Eagles in the early ’80s. “Once it got started and the length of time and all the appeals and everything that’s happened, a lot of that has changed.”

“A lot of that” certainly has. And perhaps the biggest change involves how the settlement deals — or fails to deal — with chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Evidence of CTE has turned up in nearly all of the former players whose brains have been examined. Those discoveries led thousands of players to join the lawsuit. Yet most of the players suffering from the consequences of CTE are unlikely to get relief under the terms of the settlement OK-ed by the court on Monday.

“I’m 59, right, and I’ve had multiple — I had concussions every day,” says five-time Pro Bowler Fred Smerlas. “But, yeah, obviously I’m concerned. I can’t sleep. I’ve got headaches, you know, anger, all that kind of stuff.”

Smerlas played nose tackle for three NFL teams from 1979 until 1992.

“This is the NFL,” Smerlas says. “They wield a giant club. And we’re just a bunch of old guys that can hobble around.”

“People like Fred, they’re kind of going to be on their own,” Hruby says. “And that’s a tough thing. Look, just because these kinds of problems that come from neurological damage, from brain damage, aren’t covered by this deal, it doesn’t make those problems any less real.”

The attorneys representing the players over the past four years had a rationale for compromising. They felt it was crucial to get some money to the most desperate players and their families as quickly as possible. In order to do that, they were apparently willing to sacrifice the interests of the many less desperate players: the ones who could not sleep and were prone to violent mood swings, the ones whose marriages were disintegrating, the ones who couldn’t hold a job or read a newspaper. So it was not surprising that some of the players who will not benefit much — if at all — from the settlement appealed it. And, given the “giant club” to which Smerlas referred, perhaps it’s not surprising that they lost. Which is why journalists like Hruby are hearing from them now.

“They’re all very concerned about how CTE has essentially been written out of this deal to a large extent,” Hruby says. “And I think there was a sense, too, emotionally, for a lot of these guys of frustration and even a sense of betrayal.”

Looking Ahead

Those players can contest Monday’s judgement, but there’s little chance the full appeals court will reverse the decision. Individual players, such as DeVaughn, who opted out of the settlement, can try another strategy.

“If I feel like I’m suffering from those symptoms due to now what we know [is] CTE, I would definitely feel that the NFL would be responsible,” DeVaughn says, “and I would definitely try a lawsuit.”

Lawsuits take time, especially when brought against entities determined to delay them. They require resources many of the players don’t have, whereas the NFL has resources aplenty.

Perhaps the best hope for the former players currently suffering from symptoms of CTE is in the league’s stated willingness to revisit the terms of the agreement if medical science develops a CTE test that can be administered to a living person. The consensus seems to be that this will happen, perhaps within a decade.

That can’t be much comfort to the men and families whose lives are falling apart now.

Related:


Full article from Only a Game via http://ift.tt/249JSfv

Wednesday, April 20, 2016

Concussion Settlement Affirmed But Fight Must Continue

Minnesota Vikings quarterback Teddy Bridgewater lies on the field after suffering a concussion. On Monday, a three-judge panel (AP Photo/Ann Heisenfelt, File)

On Monday, a three-judge panel affirmed a concussion settlement between the NFL and retired players. Bill Littlefield hopes the NFL is held accountable for the damage it has done. (Ann Heisenfelt/AP)

“Though not perfect, it is fair.”

Thus spoke the three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday. The issue at hand was the settlement the National Football League had made with thousands of former players: a settlement that will pay those players as much as $1 billion over the next 65 years.

A billion dollars is a lot of money, even for a business that takes in more than $12 billion each year. But $1 billion spread over 65 years and parceled out to thousands of men suffering from work-related Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, ALS, and various levels of “neurocognitive impairment” is not enough. Include money to be paid to the surviving family members of the men who’ve already died as a result of those diseases or chronic traumatic encephalopathy and the injustice is more apparent. The NFL’s accountants can write off the money as the acceptable cost of doing business.

And as far as responsibility or liability is concerned, the money is the whole story. The message is “Take it and go away.”

The players appealing the settlement made the case that the NFL, its spokespeople, and doctors employed by the league and the individual teams had combined to create “a disinformation campaign that disseminated junk science” rather than acknowledge that the day-to-day business of the NFL was diminishing the lives of its employees. The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals didn’t dispute that contention. The panel of judges merely said they didn’t want to make the perfect the enemy of the good.

The rationale for that contention is that some of the players and the families caring for them now and over the next half century or so will get some help. They certainly need it.

But by agreeing to pay the players and their families, the league has avoided publicity potentially much worse than what it has already experienced: testimony demonstrating that the pro football establishment knew it was endangering the players and hid that knowledge. Though the NFL has recently celebrated itself for changing some of pro football’s rules and procedures, thereby perhaps limiting some of the most spectacularly hideous consequences of the game’s risks and collisions, it was only last month that a senior league official acknowledged for the first time that pro football and degenerative brain disease are linked. By then, nobody was shocked by that acknowledgement. The only surprise was that after more than two decades of denial, a league official had finally surrendered.

No committee and no individual will be held responsible for the damage done. That’s what the NFL will spend a billion dollars to buy.

Related:


Full article from Only a Game via http://ift.tt/24216v5

Saturday, April 02, 2016

From Football To Broadway To Wall Street: The Re-Invention Of Eddie George

Since Heisman-winning running back Eddie George left the gridiron, he's acted in the Broadway musical "Chicago" and gotten his MBA. (Ronald Martinez/Getty Images)

Since Heisman-winning running back Eddie George left the gridiron, he’s acted in the Broadway musical “Chicago” and gotten his MBA. (Ronald Martinez/Getty Images)

Eddie George played football for Ohio State University. He won the Heisman trophy. He had a nine year NFL career with the Tennessee Titans, Houston Oilers and Dallas Cowboys. But when his football career ended unexpectedly, he had to find a way to re-invent himself.

“I mean you can use the term re-invent, I guess,” George says.  “Because I’ve gone from the football field to Broadway, from Broadway to Wall Street, so to speak. But that’s who I evolved into, and I spent a lot of time doing that. So that’s where I am today.”

George first started taking acting lessons as a way to improve his skills as a sports commentator. But he soon found that the two sets of skills don’t really have a lot in common. Instead, he discovered a love of the theater. His biggest role to date? Playing Billy Flynn in the musical, Chicago — on Broadway.

“I performed for seven weeks. I enjoyed every moment of it. You know, it’s like riding a roller coaster ride. Once I hear the music it’s like, ‘OK, here we go, it’s the uptick.’ You’re going up and you’re slowly going up. And then when I hit the stage it’s like I’m being shot out of a cannon. And before I know it, I’m off stage. It seems like seven weeks is a long time but it goes by so fast.”

 

George tells his story, In His Own Words. To hear the full story, click the play button below the headline at the top of the page. 

Related:


Full article from Only a Game via http://ift.tt/1UJKpTK

Saturday, March 26, 2016

Charlie Pierce: The Week In Sports

After his team beat Duke by 14 points in the Sweet 16, Dillon Brooks says Mike Krzyzewski complained about his showboating. (Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images)

After his team beat Duke by 14 points in the Sweet 16, Dillon Brooks says Mike Krzyzewski complained about his showboating. Charlie thinks this controversy has a silver lining. (Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images)

A bit of controversy followed Oregon’s Sweet 16 victory over Duke: Ducks player Dillon Brooks says that Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski told him he was, “too good of a player to be showing out at the end.” Only A Game analyst Charlie Pierce thinks we should just be happy that Duke is no longer in the tournament. Bill and Charlie also discuss MLB’s decision to mandate full-time Spanish interpreters and The New York Times’ report that the NFL’s concussion research was flawed.

More of Charlie Pierce


Full article from Only a Game via http://ift.tt/1ocx8EH

3 Stories You Should Know: NFL Studies, Buscaglia, Retirement Tours

David Ortiz will be the latest athlete to embark on a season-long retirement tour, as he has said that the 2016 season will be his last. (Jason Miller/Getty Images)

David Ortiz, who plans to retire after the 2016 season, will be the latest athlete to embark on a season-long retirement tour. Have these tours become too much? (Jason Miller/Getty Images)

The NFL is under fire yet again after the New York Times reported on Thursday that the league has stood by flawed concussion research. Also this week, Cowboys owner and general manager Jerry Jones and Cardinals coach Bruce Arians made controversial comments about the safety of the game. The league has certainly never been known for its proper handling of player safety, but Karen Given thinks these instances might represent a bigger problem. That’s just one of the topics in this week’s edition of “3 Stories You Should Know.”

Sports writer Erik Malinowski and Only A Game’s Karen Given join Bill Littlefield.

1. NFL’s Lack Of Control  

According to the Times, the NFL failed to take into account more than 100 diagnosed concussions from 1996 to 2001 when it calculated concussion rates. Also this week, Cowboys owner Jerry Jones said it is “absurd” to link football and the degenerative brain disease CTE, and Cardinals coach Bruce Arians told MMQB that people who won’t let their kids play football are “fools.” Karen Given chalks these up as more examples of Roger Goodell’s failed leadership. 

KG: What I’m worried about is that [Roger Goodell is] not in charge of the script. He’s not making sure that the people in his organization are armed with actual facts. And so, I ask, how much incompetence does this guy have to show before owners say, “It’s not only about all the money that he’s making for us. It’s also about the integrity of this game?”

 2. Buscaglia’s Parting Message 

Sal Buscaglia, longtime women’s basketball coach at Robert Morris, ended his career with a loss. His 16-seed Colonials suffered a 52-point loss to perennial powerhouse UConn in the first round of the NCAA Tournament. After the game, Buscaglia told the assembled reporters that female players “deserve recognition” — and not just at special events. He told them not to treat his players or other women playing basketball and other sports as “second class.” Bill Littlefield hopes that Buscaglia’s message is heard. 

BL: Women’s sports don’t generate nearly as much money as the men’s sports do, of course, and we live in a land where it’s money that matters, to quote Randy Newman. I hadn’t meant to do that. But anyway, I wish Sal Buscaglia wasn’t retiring quite yet. I hope he keeps speaking out or somebody else takes up the cause.

3. Farewell Tours

Athlete retirement tours are all the rage these days. Yankees star Derek Jeter said his long goodbye throughout the 2014 season and Kobe Bryant is spending his final campaign collecting endless amounts of tributes. Now, MLB appears to have two retirement tours on the horizon as David Ortiz will call it a career after this upcoming season and Alex Rodriguez is expected to hang up his cleats at the end of 2017. Erik Malinowski sees these season-long farewell tours as elaborate promotional campaigns.

EM: You could kind of look at this as maybe something designed to maximize ticket sales, maybe sell a few more jerseys in the team store on the player’s way out of town. I’m curious, do we think that these fêtes really benefit the game in some way? I mean, did Mariano Rivera really need a rocking chair made out of busted up baseball bats?

More Stories You Should Know:


Full article from Only a Game via http://ift.tt/25p5WnP